The Democratic chair of the Property Oversight Committee on Wednesday invited the CEOs of many major U.S. gun makers to testify at a listening to later this thirty day period as the country reels from a string of horrific mass shootings.
In letters to the main executives of Daniel Protection, Smith & Wesson Models, and Sturm, Ruger, and Firm, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) pointed out that the committee she prospects is analyzing “the position of the firearms market in the gun violence epidemic, which include with regard to the sale and marketing and advertising of assault weapons and the wide civil immunity that has been unfairly granted to makers.”
“Your testimony is critical to have an understanding of why your enterprise continues to provide and sector these weapons to civilians.”
“I am deeply troubled that gun brands continue to earnings from the sale of weapons of war, such as AR-15-model assault rifles that were being utilised by a white supremacist to murder ten individuals in Buffalo, New York and in the massacre of 19 little ones and two academics in Uvalde, Texas,” Maloney wrote. “Just this Monday, as Americans celebrated our nation’s Independence Working day, a shooter utilised an AR-15-style rifle to kill at minimum seven people today and wound dozens of many others in the course of a Fourth of July parade in Highland Park, Illinois.”
“Solutions bought by your business,” she included, “have been employed for decades to carry out homicides and even mass murders, but your company has continued to sector assault weapons to civilians.”
The forthcoming hearing, scheduled for July 20, is component of a broader investigation into the U.S. gun violence disaster that the Home Oversight Committee introduced in late Could, days soon after the Uvalde massacre—one of hundreds of mass shootings that have taken spot in the U.S. so far this calendar year.
Daniel Defense, the Ga-dependent arms maker whose CEO has been invited to provide testimony later this month, is the company of the AR-15-style semiautomatic rifle that the Uvalde gunman utilized to kill 21 people at Robb Elementary College.
“Dr. Roy Guerrero, a pediatrician who handled victims of the Uvalde capturing, testified to the devastation the AR-15-design and style assault rifle has on the bodies of children, who had been ‘pulverized’ and ‘decapitated’ by the bullets fired at them,” Maloney wrote in her letter to Daniel Defense CEO Marty Daniel.
“As the chief govt officer of a important firearms manufacturer that sells hundreds of assault weapons,” the New York Democrat ongoing, “your testimony is essential to fully grasp why your organization carries on to market and sector these weapons to civilians, what ways your company plans to take to shield the community, and what extra reforms are required to avert even more fatalities from your solutions.”
In accordance to The Trace, an investigative outlet that tracks gun violence in the U.S., “publicly traded gun companies have netted somewhere in the ballpark of $3 billion” given that the coronavirus pandemic began, “much outpacing past years’ earnings.”
“More than 45,000 persons died by gunfire in the initial year of the pandemic, in accordance to the Facilities for Disorder Command and Prevention—an accretion of hundreds of smaller mass shootings, lethal community disputes, and firearm suicides that pushed the demise toll to an all-time high,” The Trace mentioned in late May perhaps. “Estimates counsel the bloodshed only worsened in 2021, and exhibit that firearm violence remains elevated heading into this summer season.”
In a assertion on Thursday, Maloney said that “due to the fact the Oversight Committee released our investigation into the gun business and its disgraceful function in marketing these dangerous weapons, we discovered that Daniel Defense, Smith & Wesson, and Sturm, Ruger perform outstanding roles in an marketplace that tends to make billions of dollars in income marketing these solutions, which includes advertising the assault weapons utilised in Highland Park and Uvalde.”
“I am inviting the chief executive officers of these firearms companies to describe to Congress and the American individuals why they carry on to sell merchandise to civilians that are intended to be utilized in the battlefield,” she added.